So far, I've refrained from commenting on the matter of guilt or innocence and focused primarily on trying to highlight misinformation in the Luke Mitchell campaign - which unfortunately, there is a lot of. However, through stripping away the misinformation and lies about the victim's family, I inevitably do now have questions. Here are some of them: Number 1: Luke knew to turn left immediately after climbing through the V break One of the biggest grievances for campaigners in support of Luke Mitchell's innocence, was that the other three members of the search party (Jodi's gran, sister and sister's then partner, often referred to as the search 'trio') present when Luke found the body, changed their statements. It was said that they all agreed with Luke in their first statements, that his dog had found the body, but later changed this to say that he had walked straight to the wall. We were told that the jury knew nothing of it. This can be found in various ...
An article in the Scottish sun 20/11/22, titled 'I found a knife in a skip near where school girl Jodi Jones was murdered - before it vanished', states: " Lawyer Scott Forbes, part of Mitchell’s legal team, said: This is the real missing knife." “Like so much of the evidence, it was either destroyed or went missing if it didn’t fit the police narrative.” A car mechanic from the Garage also said “When I learned it wasn’t documented, it raised my suspicions the police may have tried to conceal the discovery.” Article Link: https://www.thescottishsun.co.uk/news/9795271/knife-skip-jodi-jones-murdered/ Scott Forbes discusses the knife in the skip in an interview on YouTube channel Premeditated patter, 01/01/23. He says: "Recently we've found that they took swabs from that knife, but never tested it" Link: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=q_Qkg7e7Noo&t=284s (24.54) But the knife WAS documented and tested. Below are two Freedom of information response...
Page 125 of Innocents Betrayed: Mrs Bryson picked out Luke’s photo as “very like” the person she saw on the afternoon of June 30th, even though she was clear that she did not see the face of that person. What do the transcripts say? This same statement appears to be read out during page 183 of Mrs Bryson's evidence: "Image 4 is very, very like the male I saw at the top of the path". The witness also goes on to say (and this is not mentioned in Innocents Betrayed) In regards to the photograph - " It looked like a person who was there that day, yes" She is questioned regarding pointing out the photograph showed to her by Police And did you point that photograph out to Police? - I did, yes And why did you point that person out to the Police, who did, do you think the person was? - I took it to be the person I saw that day She also said " I'm sure as I can be that it is the same male" https://lukemitchelltrialtranscripts.blogspot.com/2024/06/andr...
Comments
Post a Comment