Transcript comparisons
![Image](https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEjFb3zOLRiaaFpRwpOoN-wd3dToRVE6hXUUFM819ENgU2VnM2iZ76veP5TfkYkQRGfWuWKTFpe_cFTUMeKua729SqWDvY61Vyde61eekOyE015pHHLRe1h4eBS5Y6qtIiHXjv8tzOANmF16xBOsQg3nVIclGW4VYUOgslEHO8obgSgjGIQnVsZKQ1wmh7g/w320-h237/Dark%20Red%20Neon%20Futuristic%20Instagram%20Profile%20Picture%20(1).png)
These are some comparison notes, for anyone interested, from some of the transcripts from Luke Mitchell's trial. A comparison is made between the information in the transcripts and information out there in the public domain. The purpose of this is not to attempt to convince anyone of guilt or innocence - but to highlight the trial facts. (IB = Innocents Betrayed by Dr Sandra Lean) KT - Page 169 IB "The claim that he was planning to visit her again in July 2003 was based on Corinne’s plan to holiday in the same place – a plan that had since been cancelled. Jodi and Luke were, in fact, planning a sleepover at a friend’s house the following weekend as part of a birthday celebration – the very weekend the prosecution alleged Luke would be going to see (KT). None of the available evidence supported the claim that Luke was seeing another girl" Corinne's Transcript 13/01/2005 pages 2263 and 2264 P2263 : Right, was he supposed to be visiting K at ( hometown ) in the cour