The destruction of productions - why so long to act on the information?

-

 


In November 2022, the story broke in the Scottish Sun, that Police had destroyed evidence from the Jodi Jones murder case. The claim was, that this had been done illicitly:

https://www.thescottishsun.co.uk/news/9846975/cops-destroyed-evidence-jodi-jones-luke-mitchell/

The article states: "It then emerged that detectives had mysteriously taken it all away in September 2021 - just a few months after a shock TV documentary claimed there was major doubt on Mitchell’s guilt."

According to Scott Forbes, when the documentary aired, somebody was told by a member of the Police that the productions from the case were being destroyed. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=KSLM2jxngXc

The documentary aired on Channel 5 in February 2021. 

In an interview in November 2023, Mr Forbes said that the Police person had come to him "maybe 18 months ago", which would be around May 2022 - 15 months after the documentary first aired. 

If it is the case that someone was informed near the time of the documentary, that there was any possibility that the productions may be at risk, why did it take until November 2022 for the destruction of evidence story to break and for the legal team to halt the disposal? Why did the Police person have to approach Mr Forbes instead?

If, as the Sun article had stated, the preparation for the destruction began in September 2021, that's still around 8 months before Mr Forbes said that the Police person contacted him - and 12 months before the story broke.

Who was the first person who was informed - and why didn't they act sooner? It has been claimed that only 10% of the productions remain - could more have been saved, if the first person had acted sooner?


On 11/01/24 Scott Forbes responded to questions regarding the evidence destruction:





But the first mention of any undertaking to prevent the destruction of evidence is 16th November 2022, as stated in a letter read out by Sandra Lean in a YouTube update in April 2023: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=bDtivG_psQY (2:50)

"I can confirm the undertaking provided by COPFS and Police Scotland on the 16th November 2022, that no productions that remained held would be disposed of, and this undertaking still stands"

Mr Forbes said that he was not made aware of the destruction until "maybe 18 months ago"/around May 2002 - and there is no mention of any demand for the destruction to be halted before this point, or indeed, until November 2022. If the whistle blower was being ignored until contacting Scott, there would have been no one to attempt to ensure any undertaking prior to this point - and if there was, then surely there would be no need for them to contact Scott? 


Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

The Luke Mitchell campaign - how have things deteriorated to this?

-
Image
  There was a time when campaigners fighting the claimed wrongful conviction of Luke Mitchell raged against the vilification of a 14 year old boy, who they shouted, had not been proven to have committed the crime. Their fight fueled by the abhorrent public denigration of an individual, by a media who cared not for facts, only sensationalism. While the campaign has evolved from the 2021 documentary, in to a petition and protests - recent online presence from campaign leaders, one in particular, seems to be well represented in the screen shots below.  This online torrent of personal attacks appears to come as a response to campaigners highlighting discrepancies between newly released transcripts, and freedom of information responses - and 'case facts' provided by the two main campaign leaders.  Some of the people asking questions are individuals who have dedicated the past few years of their lives to fighting for the truth and believing that a miscarriage of justice had occurred.
Read more

The knife in the skip at Home farm WAS forensically examined and documented

-
Image
An article in the Scottish sun 20/11/22, titled 'I found a knife in a skip near where school girl Jodi Jones was murdered - before it vanished', states: " Lawyer Scott Forbes, part of Mitchell’s legal team, said: This is the real missing knife."  “Like so much of the evidence, it was either destroyed or went missing if it didn’t fit the police narrative.” A car mechanic from the Garage also said  “When I learned it wasn’t documented, it raised my suspicions the police may have tried to conceal the discovery.” Article Link:   https://www.thescottishsun.co.uk/news/9795271/knife-skip-jodi-jones-murdered/ Scott Forbes discusses the knife in the skip in an interview on YouTube channel Premeditated patter, 01/01/23. He says:  "Recently we've found that they took swabs from that knife, but never tested it" Link:  https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=q_Qkg7e7Noo&t=284s (24.54) But the knife WAS documented and tested. Below are two Freedom of information response
Read more

The Green shirt and the parka anomaly (excerpts from 02/12/04 transcript)

-
Image
Innocents Betrayed page 222: Where did the dozens of witnesses who saw Luke in a German army shirt go? Their statements were never released to the defence and they were never called to give evidence.  Innocents Betrayed (By Dr Sandra Lean) page 127:  Just before six o’clock, Luke was identified by people who knew him, sitting on a wall at the end of his street, 400 – 500 metres further along the Newbattle Road, wearing completely different clothes (baggy jeans, green bomber jacket with orange lining and distinctive, light coloured snowboarding boots).  02/12/04 transcript  AH, one of the three boys who saw Luke at around 6pm at the entrance to Newbattle Abbey crescent on Monday June 30th 2003, describes the clothing he believes Luke was wearing: In his first statement to Police he described: "Dark blue baggy jeans and a dark green shirt...it was definitely a shirt, not a jacket. I think it was buttoned-up and I couldn't see anything underneath it. It was down to the waist of
Read more