The dock identification not mentioned in Innocents Betrayed

 


From Innocents Betrayed page 129:

Lorraine Fleming’s dock identification was particularly outrageous. Asked by the prosecution QC if she could identify, in the court, the person she saw that day, she said: “Not sure.” Encouraged by the same QC to say if she could recognise someone in court who resembled him, perhaps from a different angle or perspective, she replied: “Yes, but his head is completely different.”. Unbelievably, that was accepted as a positive identification.

It was not witness Lorraine Fleming who said "Yes, but his head is completely different", it was Rosemary Walsh (transcript page 492, 02/12/04).

Lorraine Fleming did believe she could positively identify Luke in court - transcript page 335 (01/12/04)

Asked by the Advocate Depute if she had had a chance to look around, she responds "yes".

And do you recognise the person you saw again? - yes

Where is he? (incomprehensible)

Do you mean between the two gentlemen in the white shirts? - Yeah

Did he still look the same as he did that day? - His eyes do

The witness went on to say that his hair looked different and that he may have gained some weight. 


As well as the dock identification in Innocents Betrayed being attached to the wrong witness, the positive identification (whether the witness was correct or not) was completely omitted altogether.


Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

The Luke Mitchell campaign - how have things deteriorated to this?

The knife in the skip at Home farm WAS forensically examined and documented

The Green shirt and the parka anomaly (excerpts from 02/12/04 transcript)